MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320143803 · doi:10.2514/6.2015-2464

A logarithmic formulation for low-Reynolds number turbulence models with adaptive wall-functions

2015· article· en· W2320143803 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbulenceReynolds numberLogarithmReynolds stress equation modelMechanicsK-epsilon turbulence modelStatistical physicsReynolds decompositionPhysicsComputer scienceMathematicsApplied mathematicsK-omega turbulence modelReynolds equationMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a logarithmic formulation for low-Reynolds number turbulence models that guarantees the positivity of the turbulence variables. We also propose the use of a new consistent and model-specific wall function approach based on adaptive wall functions. The wall boundary conditions are evaluated from precomputed tables of the solutions of the 1D boundary layer problem at the current conditions and for a given turbulence model. A two-velocity scale wall function is proposed to improve predictions near stagnation, detachment and reattachment points. It is combined with a low Reynolds number turbulence model and the use of the logarithmic formulation to yield a robust and accurate solution procedure that is computationally efficient. Using both model-consistent wall function and a low Reynolds number model largely reduces the limitation of traditional wall functions related to the choice of the wall distance. Furthermore it yields solutions as accurate as when integration is performed down to the wall for a much reduced computational cost. The usual assumption of universality of the profile is investigated to determine the range of validity of the precomputed tables. The performances of the newly developed wall function in presence of pressure gradient is studied on a flat plate with pressure driven separation. Imposing a correctly computed normal derivative for turbulence kinetic energy largely improves results and the universality of the profile while leading to wall distance independent results. The present method is then validated on a complex flow by comparison to experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it