MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320183949 · doi:10.2514/6.2014-0194

Development of a Flight Data System and Experimental Determination of Aerodynamic Loads on a Wing Spar

2014· article· en· W2320183949 on OpenAlexafffund
Shazad Abraham-Doman, Craig G. Merrett

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace and Aviation Technology
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSparWingAerodynamicsAerospace engineeringAeronauticsFixed wingWing loadingMarine engineeringAirplaneComputer scienceEngineeringStructural engineeringAngle of attack

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An aftermarket Arduino-based flight data instrumentation package was developed for a Diamond DA20-A1 Katana aircraft. This package, consisting of a digital compass, pressure sensors, a GPS receiver, and three auxiliary string potentiometers will be capable of measuring and recording the pilot control surface inputs and the aircraft response to those inputs. The designed instrumentation package will be used to record flight data of the DA20-A1 Katana over a range of flight manouevres common to flight training. Using this data, an aerodynamic load model and a time dependent load history will be generated of the aircraft wing spar allowing a concurrent viscoelastic analysis to be conducted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics ConferenceSame topicAerospace and Aviation TechnologyFrench-language works237,207