Surface Roughening of PET Films through Blend Phase Coarsening
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, a novel method to increase the surface roughness of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) films is proposed. The mechanism of phase coarsening at the surface in extruded thin films of PET blended with low concentrations of polystyrene (PS) was investigated. A small amount of poly(hyroxyl ether) of bisphenol A (phenoxy resin, PKHH) was found to significantly increase the surface roughness due to its effect on the PS-PET interfacial tension. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results indicated that in the presence of PKHH, PS droplets migrated spontaneously towards the surface of the polymer film. An increased local concentration of PS near the surface took the form of encapsulated droplets. Above the flow temperature of the blend, the local concentration of PS eventually reached a level where a co-continuous morphology occurred, resulting in the instabilities on the surface of the film. The adhesion properties of films with various roughnesses were determined using a pull-off test and found to be significantly increased, which suggested that co-continuous morphology and the coarsening process increased the adhesive properties of the film.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".