Risk of Small Bowel Obstruction After the Ileal Pouch–Anal Anastomosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of small bowel obstruction (SBO), to identify risk factors for its development, and to determine the most common sites of adhesions causing SBO in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). METHODS: All patients undergoing IPAA at Mount Sinai Hospital were included. Data were obtained from the institution's database, patient charts, and a mailed questionnaire. SBO was based on clinical, radiologic, and surgical findings. Early SBO was defined as a hospital stay greater than 10 or 14 days because of delayed bowel function, or need for reoperation or readmission for SBO within 30 days. All patients readmitted after 30 days with a discharge diagnosis of SBO were considered to have late SBO. RESULTS: Between 1981 and 1999, 1,178 patients underwent IPAA (664 men, 514 women; mean age 40.7 years). A total of 351 episodes of SBO were documented in 272 (23%) patients during a mean follow-up of 8.7 years (mean 1.29 episodes/patient). Fifty-four patients had more than one SBO. One hundred fifty-four (44%) of the SBOs occurred in the first 30 days; 197 (56%) were late SBOs. The cumulative risk of SBO was 8.7% at 30 days, 18.1% at 1 year, 26.7% at 5 years, and 31.4% at 10 years. The need for surgery for SBO was 0.8% at 30 days, 2.7% at 1 year, 6.7% at 5 years, and 7.5% at 10 years. In patients requiring laparotomy, the obstruction was most commonly due to pelvic adhesions (32%), followed by adhesions at the ileostomy closure site (21%). A multivariate analysis showed that when only late SBOs were considered, performance of a diverting ileostomy and pouch reconstruction both led to a significantly higher risk of SBO. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of SBO after IPAA is high, although most do not require surgical intervention. Thus, strategies that reduce the risk of adhesions are warranted in this group of patients to improve patient outcome and decrease healthcare costs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".