Electronic Excited State Redox Properties for BODIPY Dyes Predicted from Hammett Constants: Estimating the Driving Force of Photoinduced Electron Transfer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here we formulate equations based solely on empirical Hammett substituent constants to predict the redox potentials for the electronic excited state of boron-dipyrromethene (BODIPY) dyes. We utilized computational, spectroscopic, and electrochemical techniques toward characterizing the effect of substitution at the positions C2, C6, and C8 of the 1,3,5,7-tetramethyl BODIPY core. Working with a library of 100 BODIPY dyes, we found that highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energies calculated at the B3LYP 6-31g(d) level correlated linearly with the Hammett σm value for substituents at position C8 and with Hammett σp values for substituents at positions C2 and C6. In turn, we observed that LUMO energies correlated linearly with Hammett σp at position C8 and with Hammett σm at positions C2 and C6. Focusing on a subset of 26 dyes for which reduction potentials were either previously available or measured herein and ranged from -1.84 to -0.52 V (a full 1.3 V), we found a linear relationship between redox potentials in acetonitrile and HOMO and lowest unoccupied molecule orbital (LUMO) energies determined via density functional theory (DFT). A linear correlation was thus ultimately established between redox potentials in acetonitrile and Hammett substituent constants. Combining this with equations derived for the linear relationship existing between the zero vibrational energy of the excited BODIPY and Hammett substituent constants enabled us to provide the parameters toward predicting the oxidizing/reducing power of photoexcited 1,3,5,7,-tetramethyl BODIPY dyes in their singlet excited state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".