MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320314069 · doi:10.1061/40970(309)43

Towards the Development of Sustainable Landfills

2008· article· en· W2320314069 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoCongress 2008 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMunicipal Solid Waste Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeachateBioreactor landfillMunicipal solid wasteWaste managementLandfill gasEnvironmental scienceWaste collectionTruckEnvironmental engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Historically, municipal solid waste is mostly disposed in landfills. However, with the more stringent environmental regulations and difficulties in locating new waste disposal facilities, the low cost advantage of landfills is no longer true. This manuscript discusses the development of a new generation of landfills to achieve sustainable management of municipal solid waste. A sustainable landfill involves sequential application of anaerobic degradation, aerobic decomposition, and landfill mining. Biodegradation of waste in landfills is enhanced through leachate re-circulation, landfill gas collection, air injection, and environmental monitoring. Practical waste mining and recycling processes are also presented. This new generation of landfills will eliminate the commonly encountered problems of ground/surface water contamination and landfill gas emissions, as well as the need for new land for waste disposal and associated truck routing issues for new landfills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it