MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320331927 · doi:10.3727/096368911x593154

Effects of Myeloablation, Peripheral Chimerism, and Whole-Body Irradiation on the Entry of Bone Marrow-Derived Cells into the Brain

2011· article· en· W2320331927 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Transplantation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBone marrowPeripheral bloodTotal body irradiationBone marrow transplantationPeripheralImmunologyMedicineInternal medicineCyclophosphamide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding how bone marrow-derived cells (BMDCs) enter the central nervous system (CNS) is critical for the development of therapies for brain-related disorders using hematopoietic stem cells. We investigated the brain damages and blood-brain barrier (BBB) modification following either whole-body irradiation or a myeloablative chemotherapy regimen in mice, and the capacity for these treatments to induce the entry of BMDCs into the CNS. Neither treatment had a lasting effect on brain integrity and both were equally efficient at achieving myeloablation. Injection of bone marrow cells from green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic mice was able to completely repopulate the hematopoietic niche in the circulation and in hematopoietic organs (thymus and spleen). However, GFP(+) cells only entered the brain following whole-body irradiation. We conclude that myeloablation, damages to the brain integrity, or the BBB and peripheral chimerism are not responsible for the entry of BMDCs into the CNS following irradiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it