Effects of Myeloablation, Peripheral Chimerism, and Whole-Body Irradiation on the Entry of Bone Marrow-Derived Cells into the Brain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding how bone marrow-derived cells (BMDCs) enter the central nervous system (CNS) is critical for the development of therapies for brain-related disorders using hematopoietic stem cells. We investigated the brain damages and blood-brain barrier (BBB) modification following either whole-body irradiation or a myeloablative chemotherapy regimen in mice, and the capacity for these treatments to induce the entry of BMDCs into the CNS. Neither treatment had a lasting effect on brain integrity and both were equally efficient at achieving myeloablation. Injection of bone marrow cells from green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic mice was able to completely repopulate the hematopoietic niche in the circulation and in hematopoietic organs (thymus and spleen). However, GFP(+) cells only entered the brain following whole-body irradiation. We conclude that myeloablation, damages to the brain integrity, or the BBB and peripheral chimerism are not responsible for the entry of BMDCs into the CNS following irradiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".