MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320337890 · doi:10.1080/10376178.2016.1171728

Experience and representations of health and social services in a community of Nunavik

2015· article· en· W2320337890 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Nurse · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la MontagneUniversité de MontréalCégep Marie-Victorin
FundersSocial Science Research Council
KeywordsThematic analysisFeelingPsychosocialPerceptionQualitative researchPsychologyNursingHealth carePublic relationsMedicineSociologySocial psychologyPolitical sciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: The study aims to explore representations and experiences with health and social services in an Inuit community of Nunavik. METHODS: A total of 15 semi-structured interviews were conducted with Inuit adults from a community of Northern Quebec. Informal interviews and participatory observation was conducted on six visits over two years. A thematic inductive analysis of data was conducted. RESULTS: Participants' experiences with care were largely related to the nature of interactions with service providers, and feelings about whether perceived needs were being met. Often these needs were socio-economic. Perceptions of services were based on concepts of trust, privacy and fear of consequences of divulging information, three intrinsically related themes. CONCLUSIONS: Reflections must be made on how to address the socio-economic needs of patients and how to go beyond the immediate requests to hear the psychosocial needs that patients might not feel safe to talk about.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it