MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320359678 · doi:10.1021/jp404882t

Formation of Methyl Radicals from Decomposition of Methyl-Substituted Silanes over Tungsten and Tantalum Filament Surfaces

2013· article· en· W2320359678 on OpenAlexaff
Rim Toukabri, N. Alkadhi, Yujun Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadicalTrimethylsilaneChemistryMethyl radicalDissociation (chemistry)PhotochemistryActivation energyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation of methyl radical from the decomposition of four methyl-substituted silane molecules, including monomethylsilane (MMS), dimethylsilane (DMS), trimethylsilane (TriMS), and tetramethylsilane (TMS), over tungsten and tantalum filament surfaces has been systematically studied using vacuum ultraviolet laser ionization mass spectrometry. The methyl radical intensity increases with temperature for both filaments in the low-temperature region; however, beyond the optimum temperature, a gradual decrease in the methyl intensity was observed for MMS, DMS, and TriMS when using Ta, whereas the intensity reaches a plateau with W. This is due to the fact that Ta is more efficient in releasing surface-bound H and forming active sites, leading to the adsorption of methyl radicals on the metal surface in the high-temperature regions. The apparent activation energy for methyl radical formation from the dissociation of MMS, DMS, TriMS, and TMS molecules on both W and Ta filaments increases with the increasing number of methyl substitution. The dissociation process is believed to be initiated by the Si-H bond cleavage and followed by Si-CH3 bond breaking. The obtained low activation energy values for methyl radical formation in the range of 51.1-84.7 kJ·mol(-1) suggest that the ejection of CH3 radicals is accompanied by the formation of a Si moiety bound to the metal surface. Overall, TMS produces the least number of methyl radicals on both filaments with the highest activation energy. The numbers of methyl radicals produced when using MMS, DMS, and TriMS are similar, but MMS gives the lowest activation energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207