Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As lesbian and gay community histories continue to roll of the presses, a certain thematic predictability—one focused on the analysis of sexual subcultures and identities—threatens to engulf the field. Not so with Karen Christel Krahulik's queer history of Land's End. Consider how Krahulik reconfigures the customary boundaries of the queer community study. No matter how broadly or inclusively queer is defined within the existing literature, sexual dissidence still usually demarcates the outer limits of the community under investigation. Krahulik certainly gives the “Gayflower Set” (as one 1950s tabloid dubbed the gay and lesbian residents of Provincetown) its due here. However, she also makes room for (often straight) Anglo Yankees and Portuguese immigrants, not merely as contextual background but as an integral part of the narrative. This approach allows for a nuanced treatment of the cultural tensions and accommodations among Provincetown's contending citizens. It also permits Krahulik to delve into such nonqueer areas as the laboring lives of Portuguese residents, lives marked by a resourceful occupational pluralism necessitated by the seaport's stormy economic history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it