MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320421967 · doi:10.2307/4127240

The Socio-Economic Dimension in Singapore's Quest for Security and Stability

2002· article· en· W2320421967 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hussin Mutalib

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Affairs · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocioeconomic Development in Asia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimension (graph theory)Stability (learning theory)Political scienceMathematicsComputer sciencePure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ingapore may have received kudos from the international community for charting many firsts, particularly on the economic front, but the fact remains that the republic is indeed a very small island-state and a state perpetually haunted by its sense of vulnerability. The country is merely 640 sq. km. in size and has a population of only 4 million people. Having no natural resources and comprising a predominantly ethnic Chinese populace in a region of the Malay world further constrains the republic's domestic and foreign policies.' Hence, the PAP (People's Action Party) government has adopted a pragmatic ideological culture since independence in 1965 as a way of quickly adapting to changing challenges and thereby mitigating such limitations and other anxieties confronting the city-state. Such is also its predisposition and mindset when dealing with the new security environment post-cold war and this is even more pronounced against the backdrop of globalization, in which Singapore has immersed itself fully. Evidently, there has been some perceptible change in the republic's management and approach in dealing with defence and security issues, particularly in more recent years. Perhaps this was precipitated by a similar shift in the international arena from the traditional state-centred and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePacific AffairsSame topicSocioeconomic Development in AsiaFrench-language works237,207