MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2320428533 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-4126

Abstract 4126: Identifying novel tumor modifier genes involved in gliomagenesis using retroviral gene-trapping mutagenesis screens

2010· article· en· W2320428533 on OpenAlexaff
Sameer Agnihotri, Christian A. Smith, Cynthia Hawkins, William L. Stanford, Abhijit Guha

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPTENGliomaGeneCancer researchTransgeneTumor progressionGeneticsPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwaySignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma multiforme (GBMs) are the most common and lethal of all gliomas, with an average survival of ∼ 12-16 months. Several gain- and loss-of-function genetic alterations have been implicated in gliomagenesis leading to GBM formation, however many more genetic alterations exist, as evidenced by recent reports from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project on human GBMs. Well-characterized mouse models, especially those that progressively develop gliomas, also, offer an opportunity to discover novel glioma relevant genetic alterations, using viral and non-viral random mutagenesis strategies. Using gene-trap strategies in our spontaneous transgenic mouse RasB8 glioma model, which expresses V12H-Ras under the control of the astrocyte tissue specific human promoter GFAP, we identified GATA6, a member of the GATA family of transcription factors, as a novel tumour suppressor gene (TSG) involved in progression of human GBMs and GATA4, a close family member of GATA6, to also function as a TSG involved in initiation of gliomagenesis. We now generated novel gain of function and loss of function gene-traps and transduced non-transformed but genetically susceptible primary murine astrocytes harboring either activated V12H-Ras, or loss of the tumour suppressors, p53, Ink4a/Arf, Pten−/− and over-expression of the human EGFRvIII mutant. Pending verification in our mouse models and human specimens we hypothesized that that trapped clones from V12H-Ras, p53 null and Ink4a/ARF null astrocytes would reveal progression factors, as these genetic alterations are associated with human low grade gliomas and occur early on in GBM formation. In contrast, trapped clones from astrocytes with EGFRvIII or Pten−/−, already demonstrated to promote progression, would likely lead to the discovery of initiation factors. Several gene-trapped clones led to transformation as measured by soft agar assays in initial screens using astrocytes with activated V12H-Ras. By means of inverse PCR we identified gene-trap insertion sites in introns of RapGap1, Ikkβ, Socs6, and Pink1 leading to loss of function. Of great interest was PTEN induced Kinase 1, PINK1, a mitochondrial serine/threonine kinase that is frequently mutated in patients in Parkinson disease while its link to cancer and GBM is poorly characterized. Initial screening in GBMs reveals reduced expression of PINK1 protein compared to normal human astrocyte controls. Pink1 gene-trap clones also exhibited increased proliferation and increased transformation compared to empty vector controls providing initial evidence that mouse and human PINK1 may have tumour suppressive properties, with current validation in progress. Gene-trapping strategies in robust animal models provide an invaluable tool that complement large scale cancer genome sequencing projects in identification of relevant driver GBM modifier genes in random non-biased manner. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4126.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→