Event-Triggered Multiobjective Control and Fault Diagnosis: A Unified Framework
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the area of robust control, fault diagnosis, and fault tolerant control of linear systems, many fundamental problems can be recast as H∞, I1and generalized H2control frameworks leading to the so-called mixed norm or multiobjective optimization problems. This paper develops a new linear matrix inequality (LMI) approach to the problems of event-triggered multiobjective synthesis of feedback controllers and fault diagnosis filters through a unified framework. Toward this end, at first a general problem known as event-triggered integrated fault detection, isolation and control (E-IFDIC) is defined. By utilizing a filter to represent, characterize, and specify the E-IFDIC module, a multiobjective formulation of the problem is developed based on H∞, H-, I1and generalized H2performance criteria. It is shown that when an event-triggered strategy is applied to both the sensor and E-IFDIC module, the amount of data that is sent through the sensor-to-E-IFDIC module and E-IFDIC module-to-actuator channels are dramatically reduced. A set of 'MI feasibility conditions is derived to ensure the solvability of the problem, as well as to simultaneously obtain the E-IFDIC module parameters and the event-triggered conditions. Finally, it is shown that certain existing problems in the fields of time and event-triggered control and fault diagnosis can be considered as special cases of our proposed methodology. Two industrial case studies are also provided to illustrate and demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed design methodology when compared with available work in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".