MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320522649 · doi:10.1300/j500v04n04_05

Defining “Community”

2007· article· en· W2320522649 on OpenAlexaff
Tigerson M. Young, Clarence Spigner, Nancy Farwell, Marcus Stubblefield

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcculturationRefugeeImmigrationFocus groupSociologyIdentity (music)PerceptionMultidisciplinary approachGender studiesExploratory researchSocial psychologyPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceAnthropologyLawAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Given the complexities inherent in defining “community,” we undertook an exploratory study of perceptions of “community” among immigrant and refugee youth. A multidisciplinary team of investigators carried out focus groups in three Seattle Public Housing sites with 39 teenagers, boys and girls, aged 12 to 17. Through content analysis of transcripts, key themes emerged related to community as defined by location, identity, and interests. Implications of the study suggest that many immigrant and refugee youth must literally occupy a common ground with others not of their culture, and that their own sense of “community” is forged out of the dynamic processes of acculturation and by what others think of them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Immigrant & Refugee StudiesSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207