MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320525695 · doi:10.14198/amesn.2015.20.12

La utilidad del deseo

2015· article· es· W2320525695 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Villoro

Bibliographic record

VenueAmérica sin nombre · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Mythological Studies
Canadian institutionsNovelis (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPersona

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Criaturas sin voz, reducidas a una condición de obediencia, los niños fueron vistos durante siglos como desaliñados prólogos de la edad adulta. Si la idea de individuo comienza cabalmente en el Renacimiento, la idea del niño como sujeto independiente es más tardía y apenas se vislumbra en la Ilustración. Un largo proceso cultural transformó a los seres de orejas sucias y pelo revuelto, con la cabeza llena de ideas desmedidas y palabras que no existen en los diccionarios, en personas ya realizadas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.013
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmérica sin nombreSame topicCultural and Mythological StudiesFrench-language works237,207