MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320570158 · doi:10.1097/ftd.0000000000000042

Serum Concentrations of Hydroxybupropion for Dose Optimization of Depressed Patients Treated With Bupropion

2014· article· en· W2320570158 on OpenAlexaff
A. Kathrin Laib, Sonja Brünen, Philippe Pfeifer, Philippe Vincent, Christoph Hiemke

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Drug Monitoring · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPoisoning and overdose treatments
Canadian institutionsHôpital Louis-H LafontaineUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBupropionMedicinePharmacologyActive metaboliteAntidepressantClinical Global ImpressionInternal medicineTherapeutic drug monitoringReuptake inhibitorTherapeutic effectDrugMetaboliteSmoking cessation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Bupropion is a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor approved for the treatment of depression and smoking cessation. According to the recently published reviews, it is a candidate for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to improve therapeutic outcomes and reduce risks of intolerability or intoxication. In practice, however, the use of TDM is limited due to the chemical instability of bupropion. This investigation sought to determine if the major, active, and chemically stable metabolite 4-hydroxybupropion is a suitable measure to guide antidepressant drug therapy with bupropion. METHODS: 4-Hydroxybupropion serum levels were measured using a newly developed and validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay with ultraviolet detection. They correlated with therapeutic effects measured by the clinical global impression scale for improvement. RESULTS: The study included 52 patients (50% women). Patients who were markedly improved according to the clinical global impression scale score had significantly (P = 0.042) higher 4-hydroxybupropion serum levels than those with moderate or minimal improvement (mean ± SD, 1113 ± 576, 825 ± 398, and 475 ± 331 ng/mL, respectively). Analysis of receiver operating characteristics revealed significant predictive properties of 4-hydroxybupropion serum levels (P = 0.002) for marked improvement with a lower threshold level of 858 ng/mL. Under similar mean doses (265 ± 107 versus 239 ± 100 mg, respectively), women attained significantly higher serum levels than men (1050 ± 524 versus 589 ± 352 ng/mL, respectively) and exhibited a better therapeutic effect (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Despite multiple limitations of this naturalistic study, evidence could be given that the measurement of 4-hydroxybupropion in serum is suitable to perform TDM for bupropion. Blood levels should be above 860 ng/mL to attain therapeutic improvement. Potential sex differences in bupropion pharmacokinetics, probably due to differential activities of CYP2B6, should be taken into account when the drug is prescribed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Drug MonitoringSame topicPoisoning and overdose treatmentsFrench-language works237,207