Cervical Flexion Myelopathy After Valproic Acid Overdose
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Case report and literature review of cervical flexion myelopathies. OBJECTIVE: To increase awareness that prolonged extreme neck flexion, in association with profound muscular relaxation, can produce a severe cervical myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Similar case reports of cervical myelopathies have been documented in the neurosurgical literature after intraoperative prolonged neck flexion, and after forcible prolonged neck flexion during a robbery. To the authors' best knowledge, this is the first report of a cervical flexion myelopathy after a medication overdose, and the only clinical-pathologic correlation. METHODS: Retrospective case report with clinical, radiographic, and postmortem data available for analysis. RESULTS: A transverse myelopathy at the sixth cervical level developed in a 25-year-old woman after an overdose of valproic acid in a suicide attempt. She was found in the sitting position, with her neck in extreme flexion, where she had been for an estimated 18 hours. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that her cervical cord was enlarged, maximally at C6, with prominent paraspinal soft tissue swelling. The patient died of pulmonary embolism and pneumonia. Pathologic findings included transverse spinal cord necrosis at C6; central gray matter necrosis extended to several segments below this. CONCLUSION: Prolonged extreme neck flexion, in association with profound muscular relaxation, can produce a severe myelopathy that is at least partly related to compromise of the spinal cord's microcirculation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".