MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PENGEMBANGAN RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU DENGAN PENDEKATAN KOTA HIJAU DI KOTA KANDANGAN

2013· article· en· W2320623832 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Tataloka · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitectural and Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div style="mso-element: para-border-div; border: solid white 1.0pt; mso-border-themecolor: background1; mso-border-alt: solid white .5pt; padding: 10.0pt 10.0pt 10.0pt 10.0pt; margin-left: 14.2pt; margin-right: 14.2pt;"><p class="AbstractEnglish" style="margin: 0in; margin-bottom: .0001pt;">According to Act No 26/2007 about Spatial Planning, each region is required to provide 30% of its territory as green open space (RTH), sharing of 20% as public RTH and 10% as private RTH. Ministry of Public Works introduced the Green City Development Program (P2KH) <!--[if supportFields]><span style='mso-element:field-begin'></span><span style='mso-spacerun:yes'> </span>ADDIN EN.CITE <EndNote><Cite><Author>Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum</Author><Year>2012</Year><RecNum>117</RecNum><DisplayText>(Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum, 2012)</DisplayText><record><rec-number>117</rec-number><foreign-keys><key app="EN" db-id="0ddwvt090xs55he09tn5ptsyatxsfzwr2wez">117</key></foreign-keys><ref-type name="Legal Rule or Regulation">50</ref-type><contributors><authors><author>Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum,</author></authors></contributors><titles><title> Program Pengembangan Kota Hijau (P2KH) Panduan Pelaksanaan</title></titles><dates><year>2012</year></dates><pub-location>Jakarta</pub-location><publisher>Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum</publisher><urls></urls></record></Cite></EndNote><span style='mso-element:field-separator'></span><![endif]-->(<a title="Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum, 2012 #117" href="file:///E:/TATALOKA/2013/versi%20cetak/november/8.%20Jamilah.docx#_ENREF_8"><span style="color: windowtext; mso-no-proof: yes; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;">Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum, 2012</span></a>)<!--[if supportFields]><span style='mso-element:field-end'></span><![endif]--> to assist the implementation of the mandate of this Act. This study aims to identify and predict the needs of public RTH in Kandangan City and organize referrals for expansion using Green City approach. The needs of RTH is calculated based on vast territory, population and comfort index. Comfort index of Kandangan City are in comfortable range. Based on vast territory, it takes 735,39 ha land for public RTH. Based on population, Kandangan City requires 170,81 ha. Atribute of Gren City approach used is Green Open Space. Compared with Zoning, Regulation, there should be more area needed for public RTH as green belt.</p></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it