MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320642725 · doi:10.2514/6.2012-40

Experimental Investigation of Small Amplitude Self-Sustained Pitch-Heave Oscillations of a NACA0012 Airfoil at Transitional Reynolds Numbers

2012· article· en· W2320642725 on OpenAlex
Dominique Poirel, Francisco Renê Teixeira de Sousa . Profa. Izabel Cristina Portela Bogéa Serra . Prof. Dr. Saulo José Figueiredo Mendes .

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAirfoilReynolds numberMechanicsAmplitudePhysicsGeologyOpticsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experimental investigation of a rigid but free-mounted NACA0012 airfoil in pitch-heave is conducted at transitional Reynolds numbers. In previous works, small amplitude self-sustained oscillations of the airfoil in pure pitch were experimentally observed for a specific range of chord-based Reynolds numbers of 5.5×10 4 - 1.25×10 5 . Subsequent analysis confirmed the significance of laminar boundary layer separation in this regime, which leads to negative aerodynamic damping at 0 o AOA. These oscillations have been labeled laminar separation flutter by contrast to stall flutter, the latter occurring at high angles of attack and with minimal Reynolds number dependency. In this phase of our research, we extend the experimental investigation from one to two degrees of freedom by enabling the heave motion of the airfoil. The aeroelastic dynamics is studied for a variety of structural stiffness coefficients in heave. Depending on initial conditions, two competing steady state LCOs, small and large, are observed. It is determined that the origin of the large amplitude LCOs is coalescence flutter whose exponentially growing amplitude is limited by flow separation at large AOAs. On the other hand, the small amplitude oscillations are the same laminar separation flutter type as the pitch only case. Indeed for the most part, the heave motion plays no fundamental role in the dynamics as the amplitude of the pitch oscillations is not drastically affected in comparison with the 1DOF pitch only case, nor is the range of Re numbers at which the LCOs are observed. Nonetheless the heave motion contributes to the net transfer of energy from the flow to the structure as the mean kinetic energy present in the oscillations is increased compared to the pitch only case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it