MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320680709 · doi:10.1021/je5006642

Equilibrium Conditions for TBAB and TBAC Semiclathrates of Xenon and Argon

2014· article· en· W2320680709 on OpenAlexafffund
Mónica García, Matthew A. Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsXenonArgonAqueous solutionAmmonium bromideEnthalpyChemistryVolume (thermodynamics)AmmoniumNitrogenAmmonium chlorideBromideAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ThermodynamicsChlorideInorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A constant-volume reactor was used for measuring the solid–vapor–liquid equilibrium conditions of semiclathrates formed in aqueous solutions of tetra- n -butyl ammonium bromide (TBAB) and tetra- n -butyl ammonium chloride (TBAC). The TBAB and TBAC semiclathrates were formed from pure Ar and pure Xe. The experimental temperatures ranged from (284 to 303) K, the experimental pressures ranged from (266 to 6114) kPa, the concentration of TBAB ranged from w TBAB = (0.05 to 0.20), and the concentration of TBAC ranged from w TBAC = (0.05 to 0.20). As expected, at a given temperature, the pressure required to form TBAB and TBAC semiclathrates with argon and with xenon was much lower than the pressure that was required to form pure gas hydrates. From the equilibrium data, the enthalpy of formation was estimated to be between (133 and 188) kJ·mol –1 for semiclathrates formed from argon and (55 and 127) kJ·mol –1 for semiclathrates formed from xenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical & Engineering DataSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207