MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320687331 · doi:10.1177/0954406216641455

A velocity synchrosqueezing transform for fault diagnosis of planetary gearboxes under nonstationary conditions

2016· article· en· W2320687331 on OpenAlexaff
Yunpeng Guan, Ming Liang, D. Necsulescu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSIGNAL (programming language)Time–frequency analysisInstantaneous phaseRepresentation (politics)Computer scienceFrequency domainSignal processingArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmComputer visionDigital signal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time–frequency analysis is widely used in the field of machinery condition monitoring and fault diagnosis under nonstationary conditions. Among the time–frequency methods synchrosqueezing transform outperforms others in providing fine-resolution time–frequency representation. However, it suffers from time–frequency smear when analysing nonstationary signals. To address this issue, this paper proposes a new synchrosqueezing-transform-based method which works by (1) mapping the raw nonstationary vibration signal into a corresponding stationary angle domain signal to meet the stationarity requirement of the synchrosqueezing transform, (2) performing the synchrosqueezing transform of the corresponding signal and (3) restoring the time–frequency representation of the raw signal from the synchrosqueezing transform result of the corresponding signal. As the synchrosqueezing transform is applied to the stationary corresponding signal, the time–frequency smear is eliminated in the synchrosqueezing transform result of the corresponding signal and the final signal time–frequency representation. As such the proposed method can generate a smear-free time–frequency representation with fine time–frequency resolution and thus provide more reliable diagnosis decisions. A fast implementation algorithm is also developed to simplify the implementation of the proposed method. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated using both simulated and experimental vibration signals of planetary gearboxes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering ScienceSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207