MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320705734 · doi:10.2202/1542-6580.2401

Photocatalytic Degradation of Eriochrome Black Dye in a Rotating Corrugated Drum Photocatalytic Reactor

2010· article· en· W2320705734 on OpenAlexaff
Nathalie Ho, Joanne Gamage, Zisheng Jason Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced oxidation water treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEriochrome Black TPhotocatalysisDegradation (telecommunications)Chemical engineeringCatalysisMaterials scienceEffluentChemistryPhotochemistryAdsorptionEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advanced oxidation processes have been investigated as a viable means of treatment for the degradation and removal of dye-containing effluents. In this work, the degradation of an azo dye, Eriochrome black, was studied using a novel photocatalytic reactor in which TiO2 is immobilized on a rotating corrugated drum. The degradation of the dye via the photocatalytic method was confirmed, and degradation rates were compared using different drum designs. Catalyst deactivation was observed, and this process of irreversibility was found to increase with increasing initial dye concentration in the water. A Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic analysis was applied, and it was found to agree well with the data in the initial parts of the reaction but diverged with increasing time. The discrepancy was thought to be due to the presence of unquantified reaction intermediates which may only be broken down slowly by the photocatalytic process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.603

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Chemical Reactor EngineeringSame topicAdvanced oxidation water treatmentFrench-language works237,207