MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320721925 · doi:10.1177/155989771312013

Navigating Recently Updated Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Practice Guidelines

2013· article· en· W2320721925 on OpenAlexaff
E. H. Nichols, Anne M. Gillis

Bibliographic record

VenueMD Conference Express · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrial fibrillationAntithromboticClinical PracticeAblationManagement of atrial fibrillationRadiofrequency ablationCardiologyAblation TherapyIntensive care medicineInternal medicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple organizations have published clinical practice guidelines that recommend strategies for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the clinic. This article presents various clinical practice recommendations for rate control in AF. Also discussed are the recommendations for antiarrhythmic therapy in AF, recommendations for antithrombotic therapy in AF, tools and techniques used in cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins, duty cycled radiofrequency ablation tools and techniques, as well as information about laser ablation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMD Conference ExpressSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207