Bibliographic record
Abstract
The flag of the City of Moncton has a blue field with a white disc in the centre, nine-tenths the height of the flag, bearing the city's full coat of arms.The arms have a rococo shield bordered in yellow, with four quarters.The first quarter is blue over white with a yellow beehive atop a yellow ground and bees in the sky; the second is red with three wheat sheaves in yellow, two over one; the third is white with a locomotive in brown spouting steam, over a white and brown ground; the fourth is white with a geographic feature in brown above a natural representation of waves in blue and white, arranged diagonally.Above the shield is a crest of an arm in white, over a yellow torse, holding a yellow hammer.Supporting the shield on either side are working men with tools-a blacksmith with a hammer and anvil on the left and a farmer with a scythe standing on grain on the right.Below is a wavy ribbon in red with forked ends, inscribed MONCTON in black sans-serif letters.Just above the ribbon is a curved rectangular panel inscribed RESURGO in similar but slightly smaller letters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.534 | 0.241 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".