MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320767411 · doi:10.1107/s0108767307094469

CMCF 08ID-1 beamline at the Canadian Light Source

2007· article· en· W2320767411 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paweł Grochulski, Michel Fodje, L. Delbaere

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamlineUndulatorOpticsMonochromatorPhysicsBeam (structure)Wavelength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Macromolecular Crystallography Facility has more than sixty participating protein crystallographers, located across Canada, will eventually consist of three beamlines; two insertion devices beamlines and one bending magnet beamline [1]. The first insertion device beamline (08ID-1) was intended to be a highly efficient and flexible, capable of satisfying the requirements of the most challenging and diverse crystallographic experiments, i.e. physically small crystals with large unit cell dimensions. The recently funded bending magnet 08B1 beamline has been designed to be dedicated to highthroughput data collection capable of being accessed remotely. The third, an undulator based 08ID-2 beamline, is envisioned to have micro-focusing capabilities with some restrictions in energy range. The CMCF 08ID-1 beamline has been built and is now being commissioned. The beamline is illuminated by a small-gap in-vacuum hybrid undulator (SGU), located in the upstream half of the straight section, and chicaned inboard by 0.75 mrad. The downstream half of this section is reserved for the 08ID-2 beamline SGU. The overall design of the beamline contains white beam slits (WBS), a double crystal monochromator (DCM) equipped with an indirectly cryocooled first crystal and a sagittally-focusing second crystal followed by a vertically focussing mirror (VFM). The beamline is completed with an innovative and very robust endstation, including the MarMosaic225 CCD X-ray detector. Most of the beamline components were manufactured by ACCEL Instruments GmbH (Germany). The beamline controls, similarly for the CLS facility, are being developed based on the EPICS platform. The beamline is equipped with a Rontek Spectrometer System (XFLASH 101A) for carrying out X-ray absorption near edge structure spectroscopy (XANES) for multiwavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD) experiments, and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) for the detection of metal atoms in protein derivative crystals. The beamline will be equipped with a robotic cryogenic sample changer that is based on the SSRL design (SAM). At the meeting we will present recent results of experiments performed at the CMCF 08ID-1 beamline. The CLS is supported by NSERC, NRC, CIHR and the University of Saskatchewan..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score0.905

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of CrystallographySame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207