MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320775617 · doi:10.1021/ja403249u

Photoisomerization Quantum Yield of Azobenzene-Modified DNA Depends on Local Sequence

2013· article· en· W2320775617 on OpenAlexaff
Yunqi Yan, Xin Wang, Jennifer I. L. Chen, David S. Ginger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhotochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific Research
KeywordsAzobenzenePhotoswitchPhotoisomerizationChemistryQuantum yieldDNASequence (biology)Yield (engineering)PhotochemistryNanotechnologyIsomerizationMoleculeMaterials sciencePhysicsOpticsBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoswitch-modified DNA is being studied for applications including light-harvesting molecular motors, photocontrolled drug delivery, gene regulation, and optically mediated assembly of plasmonic metal nanoparticles in DNA-hybridization assays. We study the sequence and hybridization dependence of the photoisomerization quantum yield of azobenzene attached to DNA via the popular d-threoninol linkage. Compared to free azobenzene we find that the quantum yield for photoisomerization from trans to cis form is decreased 3-fold (from 0.094 ± 0.004 to 0.036 ± 0.002) when the azobenzene is incorporated into ssDNA, and is further reduced 15-fold (to 0.0056 ± 0.0008) for azobenzene incorporated into dsDNA. In addition, we find that the quantum yield is sensitive to the local sequence including both specific mismatches and the overall sequence-dependent melting temperature (Tm). These results serve as design rules for efficient photoswitchable DNA sequences tailored for sensing, drug delivery, and energy-harvesting applications, while also providing a foundation for understanding phenomena such as photonically controlled hybridization stringency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicPhotochromic and Fluorescence ChemistryFrench-language works237,207