Implementation and Evaluation of a Logical Thinking Education for Undergraduate Students through Industry-Academia Collaboration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2010, Department of Information Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University started a logical thinking education for undergraduate students. In the subjects related to the education, students learn knowledge, skills and attitudes to foster their coherent and logical thinking abilities. These subjects were developed under the industry-academia collaboration promoted by Information-technology Promotion Agency (IPA) . This paper describes the implementation of the education and the evaluation of the educational efficiency. It contains designing educational contents and materials that reflect company needs. Emphasizing the educational effectiveness, the questionnaire results of the subject evaluation and the competence self-evaluation are included in this paper. The competence is a set of the defined behaviors that show the ability of an individual to do a job properly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it