MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320814075 · doi:10.1149/1.2729103

Development Status of SOFC Cell and Stack Technology at NRC-IFCI

2007· article· en· W2320814075 on OpenAlexaffabout
Adam Tuck, Xinge Zhang, Rob Hui, Wei Qu, Cyrille Decès-Petit, Yongsong Xie, Justin Roller, Min Kyong-Bok, Mark Robertson, Sing Yick, Radenka Marić, Dave Ghosh

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsBC Innovation CouncilNational Research Council Canada
FundersAstellas Pharma US
KeywordsCermetStack (abstract data type)Solid oxide fuel cellSinteringMaterials scienceWork (physics)Fuel cellsMetallurgyEngineeringWaste managementMechanical engineeringChemical engineeringComputer scienceCeramicChemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) development was started at the National Research Council of Canada's Institute for Fuel Cell Innovation (NRC-IFCI) in 2003 with the goal to develop the next generation of SOFC's for Canadian Industry. To accomplish this task, work focused on the development of low temperature cermet and metal supported cells, direct deposition methods, low temperature sintering, seal and stack technology. As of November 2006, 5cmx5cm cermet supported cell performance has been improved to 900 mW/cm2 @ 600{degree sign}C. These components have been incorporated into short stacks developed at IFCI to continue the push to commercialize this technology. At the same time, direct deposition technology has progressed rapidly to the point where metal supported 5x5 cells can be fabricated using sintering temperatures below 850{degree sign}C. Results of this work will be presented, along with the development path at IFCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207