Molecular Dynamics Study of the Diffusivity of a Hydrophobic Drug Cucurbitacin B in Pseudo-poly(ethylene oxide-<i>b</i>-caprolactone) Micelle Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isobaric-isothermal molecular dynamics simulation was used to study the diffusion of a hydrophobic drug Cucurbitacin B (CuB) in pseudomicelle environments consisting of poly(ethylene oxide-b-caprolactone) (PEO-b-PCL) swollen by various amounts of water. Two PEO-b-PCL configurations, linear and branched, with the same total molecular weight were used. For the branched configuration, the block copolymer contained one linear block of PEO with the same molecular weight as that of the PEO block used in the linear configuration but with one end connecting to three PCL blocks with the same chain length, hereafter denoted PEO-b-3PCL. Regardless of the configuration, the simulation results showed that the diffusivity of CuB was insensitive to the water concentration up to ∼8 wt % while that of water decreased with an increasing water concentration. The diffusivity of CuB (10(-8) cm(2)/s) was 3 orders of magnitude lower than that of water (10(-5) cm(2)/s). This is attributed to the fact that CuB relied on the wiggling motion of the block copolymers to diffuse while water molecules diffused via a hopping mechanism. The rates at which CuB and water diffused into PEO-b-PCL were twice those in PEO-b-3PCL because the chain mobility and the degree of swelling are higher and there are fewer intermolecular hydrogen bonds in the case of PEO-b-PCL. The velocity autocorrelation functions of CuB show that the free volume holes formed by PEO-b-3PCL are more rigid than those formed by PEO-b-PCL, making CuB exhibit higher-frequency collision motion in PEO-b-3PCL than in PEO-b-PCL, and the difference in frequency is insensitive to water concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".