MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320911431 · doi:10.1515/htmp.2000.19.1.25

The Development of Solid Electrochemical Deposition (SED)

2000· article· en· W2320911431 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHigh Temperature Materials and Processes · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsFuelCell Energy (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCeramicFast ion conductorElectrochemistryDeposition (geology)Solid oxide fuel cellNanotechnologyThin filmOxideIonic bondingSolid-stateInterfacingElectrolyteElectrodeEngineering physicsComposite materialMetallurgyComputer scienceIonChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interfacing of thin film vapor deposition technologies and solid state electrochemistry has led to the recent development of solid electrochemical deposition (SED). Studies have shown that SED processes have fundamental similarities in terms of mass and charge transport through the solids for further deposition. The emergence of SED techniques for fabricating fully dense thin-film ceramic components, and creating intimate contact between solid electrolytes and electrodes, has made possible the successful fabrication of solid state ionic devices, such as solid oxide fuel cells and sensors. Furthermore, SED also holds the promise of being used as an experimental tool to determine the physical properties of different solid state ionic materials of fundamental and practical importance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it