MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320912908 · doi:10.1149/1.2729208

Electrochemical Characterization of Air Plasma Sprayed LSM/YSZ Composite Cathodes on Metallic Interconnects

2007· article· en· W2320912908 on OpenAlexafffund
Bradley White, Olivera Kesler, Lars Rose

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceCathodeYttria-stabilized zirconiaMicrostructureDielectric spectroscopyScanning electron microscopeComposite materialPolarization (electrochemistry)Composite numberElectrochemistryElectrolyteCubic zirconiaElectrodeChemistryCeramic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porous composite cathodes composed of (La0.8Sr0.2)0.98MnO3-y (LSM) and yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ) have been produced by axial air plasma spraying on porous metal interconnect substrates and characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Cathodes with different microstructures were produced by varying the input parameters of the APS process to determine the effect of this variation on cathode microstructure and performance. Symmetrical double-cathode cells with YSZ electrolytes produced by plasma spraying were also fabricated for comparison of electrochemical performance at temperatures ranging from 650{degree sign}C to 900{degree sign}C, using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to correlate the microstructural quality with the cathode polarization resistance. Values of the APS process parameters most suitable for the deposition of LSM/YSZ composite cathodes were identified, and post-testing analysis of the symmetrical cells was carried out to examine the degradation of the metal substrate and cathodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207