Performance of Solvent Mixtures for Non-aqueous Extraction of Alberta Oil Sands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-aqueous extraction of Alberta oil sands is of great interest to developing an alternative to the current hot-water extraction process to eliminate the tailing ponds. Investigations have been conducted to evaluate the performance of solvent mixtures to extract bitumen from a high-grade oil sands ore. Solvent mixtures of cycloalkane and n -alkanes were studied on the basis of their Hildebrand solubility parameters, which affect bitumen recovery and fine solids migration during the extraction process, and the results were compared to single solvents. Cyclohexane, cyclopentane, and methylcyclopentane were selected as the cycloalkane solvents, and they were studied in combination with n -alkane solvents, such as n -heptane, n -hexane, or n -pentane, to make up a final solubility parameter between 16.65 and 16.45 MPa 1/2 for the final solvent mixture. It was observed that the solubility parameter of the solvent mixture has more impact on the migration of fine solids in bitumen than the recovery of bitumen. The amount of fine solids migrating into the bitumen product followed the order of cycloalkane/ n -heptane > cycloalkane/ n -hexane > cycloalkane/ n -pentane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".