MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320941965 · doi:10.1115/imece2014-36697

Cost Optimization of FDM Additive Manufactured Parts

2014· article· en· W2320941965 on OpenAlexaff
Hargurdeep Singh, Farzad Rayegani, Godfrey C. Onwubolu

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 2A: Advanced Manufacturing · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsSheridan College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaster graphicsProcess (computing)Orientation (vector space)Computer scienceManufacturing costFused deposition modelingAir gap (plumbing)Suspension (topology)Cost estimateEngineering drawingReliability engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineering3D printingMathematicsMaterials scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the experiments carried out on fused deposition modelling (FDM) machine to investigate the effects of process parameters on the cost of producing suspension arm and articulated rod. The process parameters considered include build orientation, raster width, and air gap. Using the cost estimation procedure described in this paper, the best option for part orientation, raster width, and air gap is realized which impact on the cost of manufacturing the part. Consequently, before committing to run the FDM machine, users can anticipate process parameters that will minimize manufacturing cost. However, in some cases, other objectives need be considered such as functionality since the configuration that leads to minimum cost may not necessarily result in optimum functionality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 2A: Advanced ManufacturingSame topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207