Hemangiopericytoma of the sella mimicking pituitary adenoma: case report and review of the literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hemangiopericytoma (HPC) is a potentially malignant vascular neoplasm that in rare cases presents as a primary intracranial lesion, where most often it is meningeal in origin. Hemangiopericytoma arising within the sella turcica is an even more sporadic event. To our knowledge, only 9 cases of HPC presenting as a sellar or suprasellar mass have been reported in the literature. Often, these cases can mimic and be mistaken for a pituitary adenoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We report a case of an 18-year-old woman presenting with a sellar mass which was thought both clinically and radiologically to be a pituitary adenoma. RESULTS: Based on histologic, immunohistochemical and electron-microscopic studies, the diagnosis of sellar HPC was made. CONCLUSION: Hemangiopericytoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of sellar or suprasellar masses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".