MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321040303 · doi:10.1190/ice2016-6336079.1

Tectono-sedimentary evolution of the Porto basin (NW offshore Portugal): Implications for hydrocarbon exploration

2016· article· en· W2321040303 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
João Casacão, Nuno Pimentel, Rui Pena dos Reis, Pedro Barreto

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference and Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain, 3-6 April 2016 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarine pipelineGeologyStructural basinSedimentary rockHydrocarbon explorationSedimentary basin analysisSedimentary basinBasin modellingPaleontologyGeomorphologyGeochemistryOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study reassesses the evolution and petroleum potential of Porto Basin, based on Basin and Petroleum Systems modeling to evaluate the margin maturity and complemented with new insights in the prediction of lithology variations on the unexplored deep offshore area, consequently contributing to the future hydrocarbon exploration. The Meso-Cenozoic Porto Basin is a rift-type basin located in the NW Iberian margin that evolved into a typical non-volcanic passive margin. It corresponds to the conjugate margin of the Canadian Flemish Pass Basin, where significant commercial discoveries recently occurred. The basin area extends from the shallow offshore platform, westwards beyond the continental slope into the deep offshore (water depth up to 3000 m) and, although with few published data, it had been explored twenty years ago. Good volumes of oil and gas-prone Early and Late Jurassic source rocks (present-day TOC values: 0,5 – 1,6 wt%), as well as different types of reservoirs (e.g. channel-lobe siliciclastics, reef buildups, karstified dolomites) are considered to be present in this basin. Rifting was initiated in the Late Triassic, with the Hercynian structural fabric playing a crucial role in controlling basin architecture. The basin margin's geometry, in which the Porto-Tomar main border fault plays a significant role, has been shaped mainly by Mesozoic extensional tectonics. Some extension-related features such as ENE-WSW trending fault zones evolved into major transfer faults during the second (Late Jurassic) and third (Early Cretaceous) rifting stages. The newly-formed transfer faults reactivated Hercynian structures visible in the onshore domain, and most likely controlled the rift shoulder sediment bypass, leading the sediment input from the onshore/proximal to the distal domains. The basin marginal and internal architecture suggests the existence of several relay-ramp structures that also controlled sediment pathways into the basin's depocenters. Alpine-related orogenies (Pyrenean and Betics) were responsible for late tectonic inversion, inverting normal faults and reversing strike-slip transfer faults as well as creating new structural traps and ultimately destroying pre-existing ones. The Porto Basin tectono-sedimentary evolution had an important impact on petroleum systems, affecting crucial parameters such as subsidence and maturation, siliciclastic accommodation space and depocenters, structural traps and seal integrity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference and Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain, 3-6 April 2016Same topicGeological and Geophysical Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207