MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321046866 · doi:10.1061/41016(314)108

Seismic Loading Behavior of Thin Steel Plate Walls

2008· article· en· W2321046866 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2008 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsTeck (Canada)University of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthotropic materialBracingStructural engineeringInfillBucklingSteel plate shear wallFinite element methodShear wallYield (engineering)Materials scienceShear (geology)EngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent research has demonstrated that Steel Plate Shear Wall (SPSW) structures can act as an effective and economical lateral bracing system. In this paper, simplified and detailed analytical models of a 4-storey specimen tested at the University of British Columbia (UBC) were generated to assess the ability of current analysis techniques to reasonably describe the behaviour observed during the experiment. The yield and ultimate strength as well as post-buckling behaviour of the specimen were reasonably well predicted by the simplified models. The orthotropic model representation of a SPSW system produced stresses in the beams, columns and infill plates consistent with the results obtained from a detailed explicit finite element formulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it