MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321094013 · doi:10.1021/cm400802d

A “Plug-and-Play” Method to Prepare Water-Soluble Photoresponsive Encapsulated Upconverting Nanoparticles Containing Hydrophobic Molecular Switches

2013· article· en· W2321094013 on OpenAlexaff
Tuoqi Wu, John‐Christopher Boyer, Madeleine Barker, Danielle Wilson, Neil R. Branda

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromophoreFluorescencePhotochemistryNanoparticleMaterials scienceVisible spectrumDiaryletheneQuenching (fluorescence)AmphiphileLanthanidePhoton upconversionNanotechnologyPolymerLuminescenceChemistryPhotochromismOptoelectronicsCopolymerOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A convenient and versatile protocol to encapsulate lanthanide doped upconverting nanoparticles by an amphiphilic polymer shell containing photoresponsive diarylethene chromophores was developed. The assemblies are all water-soluble and fluoresce in the visible region of the spectrum when excited with 980 nm near-infrared light. The fluorescent emission can be selectively and reversibly modulated by alternatively irradiating the photoresponsive nanoparticles with UV light and visible light, which triggers ring-closing and ring-opening reactions of the chromophores, respectively. Fluorescence lifetime experiments suggest that the quenching mechanism is a combination of energy transfer and emission-reabsorption processes. These photoresponsive upconverting nanoparticles have the potential to advance bioimaging and other applications in nanophotonics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicLuminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsFrench-language works237,207