MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321100596 · doi:10.1139/cjpp-2013-0219

Impaired chemoreflex sensitivity during septic shock induced by cecal ligation and perforation

2013· article· en· W2321100596 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael Brian Santiago, Alexandre Antônio Vieira, Alexandre Giusti‐Paiva

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsPhenylephrineMedicineAnesthesiaLigationPerforationSham surgeryHeart rateSeptic shockMean arterial pressureShock (circulatory)PeripheralBlood pressureInternal medicineSepsisPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we sought to determine the effects produced by cecal ligation and perforation (CLP) on the autonomic responses to the activation of peripheral chemoreflexes in conscious rats. The peripheral chemoreflex was activated with potassium cyanide (KCN; 40 μg·(0.1 mL)(-1); intravenous injection (i.v.)) in male Wistar rats 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after CLP or sham surgery. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and respiratory frequency (fR) were recorded simultaneously. CLP surgery reduced the baseline MAP when compared with the sham animals. In the animals of the sham group, the autonomic responses to KCN produced increases in MAP and fR as well as a decrease in HR. However, 12 and 24 h after CLP surgery, the autonomic responses to KCN were attenuated. The restoration of MAP by i.v. injected l-NAME or phenylephrine did not restore the autonomic response to KCN in rats subjected to CLP. These data show that septic shock induced by CLP compromised the autonomic responses to peripheral chemoreflex activation in conscious rats, suggesting that an important regulatory mechanism is impaired during the course of this condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207