MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321141943 · doi:10.18192/olbiwp.v5i0.1127

Le CLIC en ligne : enjeux et réponses

2013· article· fr· W2321141943 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Morgan Le Thiec

Bibliographic record

VenueOLBI Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le CLIC en ligne est un cours de français langue seconde gratuit destiné aux immigrants adultes. Financé par Citoyenneté et Immigration Canada, le projet a été élaboré par le Centre des Niveaux de compétence linguistique canadiens. Du point de vue de l’ALAO, le défi était de rejoindre un public complexe : niveau de langue parfois faible ; compétences variables en informatique ; priorité des urgences familiales et/ou professionnelles. La communication proposée permet de situer le projet, ses enjeux pour l’apprentissage des langues officielles du Canada, et de présenter les réponses apportées aux difficultés rencontrées. Ces réponses tiennent compte des travaux sur la compétence langagière, sur le français langue seconde pour adultes ou encore des bilans réalisés sur les dispositifs linguistiques d’intégration des immigrants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOLBI JournalSame topicFrench Language Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207