MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321147869 · doi:10.1155/2001/978130

Pain and Cognitive Status among Nursing Home Residents in Canada

2001· article· en· W2321147869 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePain Research and Management · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Opioid Use
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth Canada
KeywordsNursing homesGerontologyCognitionNursingMedicinePsychologyFamily medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: There is little information available on the rates of pain in institutionalized elderly persons, and this is particularly true for Canada. OBJECTIVES: To provide information about the prevalence and clinical correlates of pain in a sample of Canadian nursing homes, to determine whether residents with cognitive impairment experience lower rates of health conditions associated with pain (eg, arthritis) than residents without cognitive impairment and to determine whether the associations (ie, odds ratios) for pain with such health conditions vary as a function of cognitive status. DESIGN: The study is based on a secondary analysis of data collected with the minimum data set (MDS 2.0). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 3195 nursing home residents in Ontario, Manitoba and Saskatchewan. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: All residents were assessed with the MDS 2.0 by trained clinicians (usually nurses). Pain was documented if it had occurred within the seven days before the assessment. Assessors were trained to look for overt signs of discomfort, such as wincing or verbalizations. Self-report ratings were obtained when possible. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of pain in this sample was 49.7%, and 23.7% of residents experienced pain daily. Persons with and persons without cognitive impairments did not differ with respect to the prevalence of conditions likely to cause pain and the associations of pain with such health conditions. Regional differences were found, with Ontario residents having a higher frequency and intensity of pain than their counterparts in Saskatchewan and Manitoba. This may be due, at least in part, to regional differences in nursing home admission criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the prevalence of identified pain is lower among nursing home residents with higher levels of cognitive impairment. These results do not support the notion that this is a function of lower prevalence rates of pain-causing conditions in nursing home residents with dementia. Furthermore, the results do not support the view that residents with cognitive impairments are less sensitive to pain. This study highlights the need for more comprehensive tools to assess pain in persons with cognitive impairments. Nonetheless, the MDS may be a useful instrument for detecting pain in such populations, because it does not rely exclusively on self-report.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it