MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321184144 · doi:10.1139/l2012-108

Corrigendum: Utility impact rating with subsurface utility engineering in project development

2012· erratum· en· W2321184144 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sanjay Kumar Sinha, H. R. Thomas, M.C. Wang, Youngsoo Jung

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2012
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Received 11 September 2012. Revision accepted 11 September 2012. Published at www.nrcresearchpress.com/cjce on 24 October 2012. S.K. Sinha. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, 200 Patton Hall (0105), Blacksburg, Virginia 24061. H.R. Thomas, M.C. Wang, and Y.J. Jung. College of Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Penn State University. Corresponding author: S.K. Sinha (e-mail: ssinha@vt.edu). 1242

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0790.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207