MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321299831

Whole-Ship Motions of USCGC Healy as Applied to Global Ice Impact Forces

2001· article· en· W2321299831 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Michelle Johnston, G.W. Timco, R. Frederking, Michael D. Miles

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. NavyTransport Canada
KeywordsGeologyRidgeSea iceMarine engineeringIcebergArctic ice packGeodesyMeteorologyEngineeringClimatologyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Providing the whole-ship motions in ice operations was part of the Canadian contribution to the Arctic Ship Technology Research and Development Program conducted on the USCGC Healy. An inertial measurement system was used to measure the whole-ship motions of the USCGC Healy during its Ice Trials, April/May 2000. The system provided time-series traces of ship motions in six degrees of freedom. A variety of loading conditions was sampled, ranging from relatively light ice conditions to backing and ramming in pressured first- year ice and multi- year ice. The ship motions experienced under the different ice conditions ranged from pitch angles of 0.2° to 0.8° and roll angles of 0.6° to 4.9°. A representative case in which the ship rammed a first-year ridge in open pack ice is discussed. During that event, the ship experienced a 0.7° pitch and 4.9° roll. The whole-ship motions during the ridge impact were used to estimate a vertical bow force of 4.3 MN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207