Bibliographic record
Abstract
After a week of tough negotiations, delegates from 133 countries meeting in Montreal finalized a treaty to protect the environment from risks posed by trade in genetically engineered seeds, agricultural commodities, microbes, and live fish. Although it appeared the talks were on the verge of collapse the day before the meeting was scheduled to end, the delegates were able to reach consensus by 5 AM on Jan. 29 (C&EN, Jan. 31, page 5). All parties involved, including industry and environmental groups, are reasonably satisfied with the outcome. "It is a treaty that protects Earth's biological diversity without disrupting world food trade," said Frank E. Loy, the U.S. State Department's undersecretary for global affairs. "This is a historic step toward protecting the environment and consumers from the dangers of genetic engineering," said Benedikt Haerlin, Greenpeace International's campaign coordinator for genetic engineering. Under the agreement, called the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, countries will use an Internet-based clearinghouse ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.030 | 0.023 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".