MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321355126 · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00154

Titanium Dioxide Microsphere-Derived Materials for Solar Fuel Hydrogen Generation

2015· article· en· W2321355126 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Yan, Guosheng Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotocatalysisMaterials scienceHydrogen fuelMicrosphereWater splittingNanotechnologyTitanium dioxideSolar energyDurabilitySolar fuelEnergy carrierHydrogen productionHydrogen economyHydrogenProcess engineeringFuel cellsChemical engineeringChemistryCatalysisEngineeringComposite materialElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen fuel is an excellent energy carrier for the development of a low carbon emission economy that has the potential to solve the energy and environmental problems in the future. Photocatalytic H 2 generation has received significant growth over the past few decades. Due to their unique properties, TiO 2 microspheres have attracted much attention to be utilized in the photocatalytic H 2 generation from water splitting. These microspheres-derived photocatalysts are known to offer the advantages of large surface area, tunable pore sizes, better allowing light absorption, efficient carrier separation, excellent electronic and optical properties, and high durability. Over the past few decades, significant research efforts have been allocated to the design of TiO 2 microspheres with desired functionality for efficient H 2 generation. This perspective will concentrate on recent advances in the synthesis of TiO 2 microsphere-derived photocatalysts and their applications for efficient solar fuel H 2 evolution from water splitting. Advanced strategies for the fabrication of TiO 2 microsphere-based materials have been critically reviewed. The up-to-date developments of technologies applied to TiO 2 microsphere-based materials for photocatalytic H 2 evolution are compared and commented. Current challenges and future perspectives for solar fuel H 2 generation will be also highlighted and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207