MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321370356 · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.023414

Ionization and harmonic generation in CO and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext></mml:math>and their cations with ultrashort intense laser pulses with time-dependent density-functional theory

2014· article· lv· W2321370356 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuel Fowe Penka, Étienne Couture-Bienvenue, André D. Bandrauk

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2014
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsIonizationAtomic physicsLambdaHigh harmonic generationElectronOrder (exchange)MoleculeLaserIonQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molecular high-order-harmonic generation and molecular-orbital ionization rates are calculated for the CO, ${\text{H}}_{2}\text{CO}$, ${\text{CO}}^{+}$, and ${\text{H}}_{2}{\text{CO}}^{+}$ molecules using numerical solutions of Kohn-Sham equations of time-dependent density-functional theory in the nonlinear nonperturbative regime of laser-molecule interactions. Different laser-molecule orientations (\ensuremath{\theta} = 0, 90\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}, and 180\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}) and intensities (8.7 \ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{} 10${}^{13}$, 3.5 \ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{} 10${}^{14}$, and 1.4 \ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{} 10${}^{15}$ W/cm${}^{2}$) are used. Results show that at wavelength \ensuremath{\lambda} = 800 nm, the ionization rate maxima are influenced for each molecular orbital by the interplay between its ionization potential, its geometrical shape, and the laser polarization axis. Molecular high-order-harmonic generation is further studied by a time profile analysis and a time-dependent electron localization function. A comparison of the data between CO and ${\text{H}}_{2}\text{CO}$ illustrates the importance of the protons on the electron distributions, ionization, and recollision dynamics in intense fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207