MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321469796 · doi:10.1061/9780784412121.183

Evaluation of p-y Curves Used in Practice for Seismic Analysis of Soil-Pile Interaction

2012· article· en· W2321469796 on OpenAlexaff
Amin Rahmani, Mahdi Taiebat, W. D. Liam Finn, Carlos E. Ventura

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoCongress 2012 · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCalifornia Institute of Technology
KeywordsPileCentrifugeFoundation (evidence)Geotechnical engineeringSeismic analysisGeologyNonlinear systemStructural engineeringDeformation (meteorology)EngineeringPhysicsGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A widely used approach in practice for modeling the seismic response of pile supported structures is Beam on NonlinearWinkler Foundation (BNWF). In this approach, the nonlinear p-y curves, recommended by the American Petroleum Institute (API), are used as the backbone curves for the lateral load-deformation relationships. In this paper, the efficiency of these curves for seismic analysis of soil-pile interaction is investigated. For this purpose, recorded results of four centrifuge tests conducted on single pile foundations are compared with the computed results based on the BNWF approach employing the API p-y curves. The prediction of the seismic response based on the API p-y curves was found to be poor in the cases studied here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoCongress 2012Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207