Frontières ethniques, citoyenneté et écoles religieuses « séparées » : une cartographie des enjeux théoriques
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author discusses the theoretical issues behind the phenomenon of Faith and Ethnic Schools, a controversial issue in many national debates about multiculturalism. She explores, in the first part, the nature of ethnicity and religion, two concepts often discussed and often misunderstood in discussions on social sciences. She continues with an analysis of the role of the school role in the construction and the reproduction (or not) of ethnic boundaries in the light of different normative conceptions of ethnicity, before she examines the political implications of each of them (types of citizenship) : communautarian, liberal and republican models. In spite of the normative particularities of these political projects, they have a common goal : to balance moral pluralism and the common good. With reference to this goal, the author explores whether separate schools can apply their distinctive values to the normative perspective of citizenship in a pluralistic and democratic society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it