Intractable SUNCT Cured After Resection of a Pituitary Microadenoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: SUNCT is a rare primary headache disorder that is associated with activation of the posterior hypothalamus and often poorly responsive to medication. Recently, a relationship between between pituitary microadenoma and SUNCT has been suggested, and reports of both amelioration and exacerbation by dopamine-agonists have been published. These findings suggest a functional role for the hypothalamic-pituitary axis in SUNCT. METHODS: We report the long-term 4 year follow-up of a 35 year-old patient with a 14-year history of medically and surgically intractable SUNCT who experienced immediate and complete resolution of symptoms after resection of a 6 mm pituitary microadenoma. RESULTS: This patient was first seen at the age of 28 years with a 10-year history of attacks of right retro-orbital pain satisfying the IHS criteria for SUNCT. Many medical and surgical treatments were attempted without success. An MRI demonstrated a 6 mm microadenoma without compression of surrounding structures. A trial of bromocriptine caused marked exacerbation of his pain. The patient underwent a trans-sphenoidal resection of the pituitary lesion. SUNCT attacks worsened for the first 24h post-operatively, then disappeared. He has been completely headache-free, without medication, for the past 43 months with the last follow-up being January 2006. CONCLUSION: This case emphasizes the relationship between pituitary microadenomas and SUNCT, supports the role of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis in the genesis of SUNCT, and illustrates the importance of careful imaging of the pituitary region in patients with SUNCT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".