Pedicle Screw Fixation Under Nonaxial Loads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: An experimental study of pedicle screw fixation in human cadaveric vertebrae. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to experimentally characterize pedicle screw fixation under nonaxial loading and to analyze the effect of the surgeons' screw and placement choices on the fixation risk of failure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw fixation performance is traditionally characterized with axial pullout tests, which do not fully represent the various tridimensional loads sustained by the screws during correction maneuvers of severe spinal deformities. Previous studies have analyzed the biomechanics of nonaxial loads on pedicle screws, but their effects on the screw loosening mechanisms are still not well understood. METHODS: A design of experiment (DOE) approach was used to evaluate 2 screw thread designs (single-lead and dual-lead threads), 2 insertion trajectories in the transverse and sagittal planes, and 2 loading directions (lateral and cranial). Pedicle screws were inserted in both pedicles of 12 cadaveric lumbar vertebrae for a total of 24 tests. Four sinewave loading cycles (0-400 N) were applied, orthogonally to the screw axis, at the screw head. The resulting forces, displacements, and rotations of the screws were recorded. RESULTS: In comparison to the other cycles, the first loading cycle revealed important permanent deformation of the bone (mean permanent displacement of the screw head of 0.79 mm), which gradually accumulated over the following cycles to 1.75 mm on average (plowing effect). The cranial loading direction caused significantly lower (P < 0.05) bone deformation than lateral loading. The dual-lead screw had a significantly higher (P < 0.05) initial stiffness than the single-lead thread screw. CONCLUSIONS: Nonaxial loads induce screw plowing that lead to bone compacting and subsequent screw loosening or even bone failure, thus reducing the pedicle screw fixation strength. Lateral loads induce greater bone deformation and risks of failure than cranial loads. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".