MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321622596 · doi:10.3934/mbe.2006.3.161

Epidemic threshold conditions for seasonally forced SEIR models

2006· article· en· W2321622596 on OpenAlexaff
Junling Ma, Zhien Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Biosciences & Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasic reproduction numberExtinction (optical mineralogy)ReproductionOutbreakMathematicsBiologyBar (unit)StatisticsApplied mathematicsDemographyEcologyPhysicsMeteorologyVirologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we derive threshold conditions for eradication of diseases that can be described by seasonally forced susceptible-exposed-infectious- recovered (SEIR) models or their variants. For autonomous models, the basic reproduction number R(0) < 1 is usually both necessary and sufficient for the extinction of diseases. For seasonally forced models, R(0) is a function of time t. We find that for models without recruitment of susceptible individuals (via births or loss of immunity), max(t) {R(0)(t)} < 1 is required to prevent outbreaks no matter when and how the disease is introduced. For models with recruitment, if the latent period can be neglected, the disease goes extinct if and only if the basic reproduction number R' of the time-average systems (the autonomous systems obtained by replacing the time-varying parameters with their long-term time averages) is less than 1. Otherwise, R' < 1 is sufficient but not necessary for extinction. Thus, reducing R' of the average system to less than 1 is sufficient to prevent or curtail the spread of an endemic disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations157
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Biosciences & EngineeringSame topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesFrench-language works237,207